NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M versus NVIDIA NVS 5400M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA NVS 5400M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 660 MHz
- Environ 48% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.68 GTexel / s versus 10.56 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 versus 620
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3866 versus 2127
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 versus 5.068
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.864 versus 0.635
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 versus 11.384
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 versus 19.696
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 versus 1069
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 versus 1652
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 2282
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 versus 1069
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 versus 1652
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 2282
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 1 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 660 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s versus 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 versus 620 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 versus 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 versus 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 versus 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 versus 11.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 versus 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 versus 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 versus 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 2282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 versus 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 versus 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 2282 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 5400M
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 186 versus 149
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.562 versus 157.479
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 186 versus 149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.562 versus 157.479 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5400M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | 620 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 186 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | 2127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | 5.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | 229.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | 11.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | 19.696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 2282 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | 1069 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | 1652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 2282 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA NVS 5400M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1301 | 1439 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s | 10.56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
