NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 736 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 288
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 41% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 3828 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 versus 2970
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 3114
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 versus 2970
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 3114
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 versus 20 February 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 736 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 288 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 3828 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 versus 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 3114 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 35.33 GTexel / s versus 31.36 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 847.9 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1851 versus 1713
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 versus 333
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7032 versus 4928
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 versus 12.449
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 versus 455.796
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 versus 1.295
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.232 versus 24.566
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.114 versus 28.025
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 35.33 GTexel / s versus 31.36 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 847.9 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1851 versus 1713 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 467 versus 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7032 versus 4928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.456 versus 12.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 618.773 versus 455.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.693 versus 1.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.232 versus 24.566 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.114 versus 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1713 | 1851 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4928 | 7032 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | 18.456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | 618.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 1.693 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | 27.232 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | 50.114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | 2970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | 3114 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 | 20 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 934 | 936 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89.99 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s | 35.33 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 91.87 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 3828 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5730
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDFirePro M4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
