NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon HD 8970M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 76% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 91% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 2,304 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 46% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 4800 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 3876
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20734 versus 20588
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 57.241
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 268.643
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 2521
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 2595
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 2521
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 2595
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 14 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 72 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 2,304 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 4800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 3876 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 versus 20588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 57.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 268.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 2595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 2595 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8970M
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 1280 versus 768
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 versus 323
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1223.742 versus 843.503
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.78 versus 5.071
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.306 versus 24.676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 768 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 versus 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1223.742 versus 843.503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.78 versus 5.071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.306 versus 24.676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 versus 3687 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 3876 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 807 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20734 | 20588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 57.241 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1223.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 5.78 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 89.306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 268.643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 2595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 2521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 2595 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 8970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Neptune |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 14 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 556 | 555 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
| Unités de Compute | 20 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
