NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% de pipelines plus haut: 2432 versus 2048
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14694 versus 12585
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 versus 673
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55343 versus 52705
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 versus 927.006
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 15489
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3638 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3077
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 15489
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3638 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3077
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6812 versus 6008
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 2432 versus 2048 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14694 versus 12585 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55343 versus 52705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 versus 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 versus 6008 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1683 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 277.3 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,873 gflops versus 8,186 gflops
- Environ 80% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 13% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 versus 182.11
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 versus 1797.792
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 versus 14.071
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 versus 26.444
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1683 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops versus 8,186 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 versus 26.444 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14694 | 12585 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55343 | 52705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 | 6008 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $2,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 243 | 244 |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | $1,699.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | 8.38 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 255.8 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256.3 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |