NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14694 versus 12190
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 versus 441
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 versus 9538
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 versus 9538
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 versus 13 September 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14694 versus 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 versus 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 367.4 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 58% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2432
- Environ 44% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,758 gflops versus 8,186 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62453 versus 55343
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 versus 182.11
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 versus 1797.792
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 versus 14.071
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 26.444
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 versus 1035.984
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3638
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3638
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 367.4 GTexel / s versus 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2432 |
Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops versus 8,186 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62453 versus 55343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 versus 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 versus 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 versus 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 versus 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3638 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14694 | 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55343 | 62453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 2 November 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $5,699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 243 | 246 |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 8,186 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 3840 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 255.8 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256.3 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |