NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Tesla P40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1303 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14690 vs 12190
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 441
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 9538
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 9538
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 vs 13 September 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1303 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14690 vs 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 vs 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P40
- Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 367.4 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- Around 58% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2432
- Around 44% better floating-point performance: 11,758 gflops vs 8,186 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62447 vs 55343
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 300.355 vs 182.11
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3559.383 vs 1797.792
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.757 vs 14.071
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 vs 26.444
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1214.142 vs 1035.984
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3638
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3638
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 367.4 GTexel / s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2432 |
Floating-point performance | 11,758 gflops vs 8,186 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62447 vs 55343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 300.355 vs 182.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3559.383 vs 1797.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.757 vs 14.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 vs 26.444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1214.142 vs 1035.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3638 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14690 | 12190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55343 | 62447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6812 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 2 November 2017 | 13 September 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $5,699 |
Place in performance rating | 243 | 246 |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | 11,758 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2432 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 255.8 GTexel / s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |