NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and NVIDIA Quadro M5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 72% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 861 MHz
- Environ 60% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 21% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 6612 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39403 versus 28251
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.955 versus 99.169
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1294.279 versus 1183.119
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.756 versus 7.899
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.78 versus 53.364
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 569.916 versus 498.551
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3324
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3677
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3324
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 29 June 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 861 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 6612 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39403 versus 28251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 versus 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 versus 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 versus 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 versus 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 versus 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3324 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M5000
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9391 versus 7877
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 576
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12524 versus 10959
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12524 versus 10959
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9391 versus 7877 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 576 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12524 versus 10959 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12524 versus 10959 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 | 9391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 576 | 659 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39403 | 28251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | 99.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | 1183.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | 7.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | 53.364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | 498.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 12524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3597 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | NVIDIA Quadro M5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | GM204 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 29 June 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $2,856.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 359 | 342 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $1,498 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.47 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 861 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 4,252 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 132.9 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo, 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |