NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 187.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 44918
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 150.951
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 1718.593
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 12.283
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 28.289
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 10 June 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 202.0 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 44918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 28.289 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1536
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13507 versus 8626
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 364
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 710.366 versus 492.867
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13765 versus 12301
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13765 versus 12301
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6066 versus 4905
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
Pipelines | 1920 versus 1536 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13507 versus 8626 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 364 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 versus 492.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 versus 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 versus 12301 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 versus 4905 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 13507 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 44918 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 10 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 278 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |