NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 62% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 705 MHz
- Environ 52% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 214.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 7.0 GB/s
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 22732
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 66.419
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 1261.593
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 7.89
- 5.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 17.882
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 versus 309.857
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 8124
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2413
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2226
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 8124
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2413
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 2226
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 28 May 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 705 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 338 billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 versus 309.857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 2226 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 1536
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 versus 8627
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 versus 364
- 3.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 versus 4905
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 1536 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 versus 8627 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 versus 364 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 versus 4905 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8627 | 8987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 656 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 309.857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 2226 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 17055 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 28 May 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 395 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,580 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 7,080 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 5760 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
