NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 175 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1140 MHz
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1335 MHz
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 1536
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16174 versus 8626
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 versus 364
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87137 versus 53834
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 versus 195.93
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3729.447 versus 1919.95
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 versus 14.6
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 versus 94.964
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 versus 492.867
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 12301
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 12301
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8871 versus 4905
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1140 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1335 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 1536 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16174 versus 8626 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 versus 364 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87137 versus 53834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 versus 195.93 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 versus 1919.95 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 versus 14.6 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 versus 94.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 versus 492.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 12301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 12301 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8871 versus 4905 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 16174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 8871 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 140 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
