NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 1088 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8626 versus 6636
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 versus 25146
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 9579
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 9579
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4905 versus 3489
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 11 January 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 1088 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 versus 6636 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 versus 25146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 9579 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 versus 3489 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- 4.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 364
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8626 | 6636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 | 25146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4905 | 3489 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU116 | N17E-Q1 |
Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 11 January 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 333 | 382 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 1088 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 168 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 7008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |