NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 750 Watt
- 2.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12929 versus 7987
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 752
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61464 versus 43046
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 106.585
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 versus 1878.403
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 versus 9.751
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 82.208
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 511.115
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 9143
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 9143
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12929 versus 7987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61464 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3718
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3355
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3718
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3355
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12929 | 7987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61464 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6262 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 189 |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 6,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,238 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 2816 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4500 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs
IntelArc A530M
