NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 930 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 750 Watt
• 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12931 vs 7987
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 752
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 43046
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 106.585
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 1878.403
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 9.751
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 82.208
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 511.115
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 9143
• Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3718
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3355
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3718
• 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12931 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	813 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	61407 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	208.608 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2573.643 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.447 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	145.886 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	926.614 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16952 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 32085

Compare specifications (specs)