NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti versus AMD Radeon VII
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and AMD Radeon VII pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1750 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 786
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 versus 206.353
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 versus 69.256
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 versus 499.927
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 versus 11724
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 versus 11724
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1750 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 786 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 versus 206.353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 versus 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 versus 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 versus 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16690 versus 12931
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 89411 versus 61445
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 2573.643
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 16.447
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9294 versus 6261
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 versus 12931 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89411 versus 61445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 2573.643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 16.447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9294 versus 6261 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon VII
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon VII |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12931 | 16690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 | 786 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61445 | 89411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | 206.353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | 4659.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | 21.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 | 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16952 | 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16952 | 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6261 | 9294 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | AMD Radeon VII | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 20 |
Date de sortie | 22 February 2019 | 7 February 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 200 | 214 |
Prix maintenant | $279.99 | $699.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | 32.74 |
Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 13,230 million |
Unités de Compute | 60 | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | 3 |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 305 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |