NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 versus AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 and AMD Radeon HD 6870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- 3.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4008 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 versus 412
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7872 versus 4950
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 versus 16.41
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 versus 1.346
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 versus 45.514
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 versus 21 October 2010 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 versus 412 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 versus 4950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 versus 16.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 versus 1.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 versus 45.514 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Environ 16% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 43.6 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1120 versus 336
- Environ 93% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 151 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2217 versus 1872
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 versus 781.734
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 versus 75.212
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 versus 3537
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 3117
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 versus 3537
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 3398
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 3117
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 43.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1120 versus 336 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,045.6 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2217 versus 1872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 versus 781.734 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 versus 75.212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 versus 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 versus 3537 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3398 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3117 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1872 | 2217 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 412 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7872 | 4950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 | 16.41 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 | 857.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 | 1.346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 | 45.514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 | 184.41 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3537 | 4238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3117 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3537 | 4238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3117 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF114 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 24 September 2011 | 21 October 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $239 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 840 | 842 |
| Prix maintenant | $199.99 | $89.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.01 | 38.38 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 778 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1120 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.6 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,700 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 210 mm | 220 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 465
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
