NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M versus ATI Radeon HD 5750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and ATI Radeon HD 5750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 93% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 72% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 86 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1536 MB versus 1 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1246 versus 1163
- 4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4090 versus 1012
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.121 versus 7.384
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.105 versus 0.679
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 versus 1757
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 versus 1757
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 versus 13 October 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 86 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1246 versus 1163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4090 versus 1012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 versus 7.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 versus 0.679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 versus 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 versus 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3347 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5750
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 25.2 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 720 versus 192
- Environ 94% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,008.0 gflops versus 518.4 gflops
- 3.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4600 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 337 versus 259
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 460.31 versus 391.548
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.118 versus 18.548
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 53.346 versus 32.965
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2124 versus 1699
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2124 versus 1699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 25.2 GTexel / s versus 16.1 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 720 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,008.0 gflops versus 518.4 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4600 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 337 versus 259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 460.31 versus 391.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.118 versus 18.548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 53.346 versus 32.965 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2124 versus 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2124 versus 1699 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1246 | 1163 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 259 | 337 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4090 | 1012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | 7.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | 460.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | 0.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | 23.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | 53.346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 | 2124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 | 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 | 2124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 | 1757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | ATI Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF106 | Juniper |
| Date de sortie | 3 September 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1230 | 1231 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 518.4 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 720 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.1 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 86 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 700 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Longeur | 178 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 60.0 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
