NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1544 MHz versus 738 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 49.4 billion / sec versus 11.81 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 32
- 13.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,581.1 gflops versus 117.5 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 40 nm versus 55 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1536 MB versus 512 MB
- Environ 99% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) versus 1008 MHz
- 27x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4566 versus 169
- 6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 80
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3689
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 1731
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3689
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 1731
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 9 November 2010 versus 10 March 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1544 MHz versus 738 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.4 billion / sec versus 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 32 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,581.1 gflops versus 117.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm versus 55 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1536 MB versus 512 MB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) versus 1008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4566 versus 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 versus 80 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 1731 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
- 4.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 244 Watt
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 179.899 versus 40.048
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1813.265 versus 872.651
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.817 versus 4.338
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.948 versus 32.378
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 757.451 versus 132.363
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 244 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 179.899 versus 40.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1813.265 versus 872.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.817 versus 4.338 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.948 versus 32.378 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 757.451 versus 132.363 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4566 | 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 80 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15515 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.048 | 179.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 872.651 | 1813.265 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.338 | 13.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.378 | 38.948 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.363 | 757.451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1731 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1731 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 809 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
| Nom de code | GF110 | G96C |
| Date de sortie | 9 November 2010 | 10 March 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 651 | 652 |
| Prix maintenant | $289.88 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.21 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 1544 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,581.1 gflops | 117.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 32 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.4 billion / sec | 11.81 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 244 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 314 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 168 mm |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1536 MB | 512 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.4 GB / s | 16.13 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 1008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
ATIFireMV 2200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580 vs
NVIDIAT500 Mobile
