NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 810 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 793
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 149
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4493 versus 3866
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.582 versus 9.392
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 157.479
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.254 versus 0.864
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.386 versus 16.101
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1589
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 3235
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1589
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 3235
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 345
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 versus 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 versus 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 versus 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 versus 16.101 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 3235 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 345 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Environ 42% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 360.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1802 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 versus 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 3332 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 | 793 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 | 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4493 | 3866 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.582 | 9.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 | 157.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.254 | 0.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.386 | 16.101 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.499 | 44.77 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 | 3235 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 | 3339 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK106 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1003 | 1301 |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 810 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec | 15.68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128-bit GDDR5 | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | 1802 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |