NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.5 billion / sec versus 43.9 billion / sec
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 480
- Environ 75% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4412 versus 3928
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15349 versus 13352
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 versus 736.185
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 versus 40.08
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 August 2012 versus 7 December 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec versus 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1280 MB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 versus 3928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15349 versus 13352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 versus 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 versus 40.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1464 MHz versus 915 MHz
- 316.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 versus 466
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.849 versus 36.256
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 versus 3.037
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.953 versus 82.191
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4862 versus 3285
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4862 versus 3285
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1464 MHz versus 915 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) versus 6.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 versus 466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 versus 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 versus 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 versus 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 versus 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 versus 3285 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4412 | 3928 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 | 473 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15349 | 13352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 16 August 2012 | 7 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $349 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 726 | 728 |
Prix maintenant | $321.99 | $99.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.34 | 48.11 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,459.5 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.5 billion / sec | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Options SLI | 3-way | 3-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | Two 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192-bit GDDR5 | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
DSR | ||
Surround |