NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 30.4 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 729.6 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 5.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 versus 3.396
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 versus 87.094
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.785 versus 0.243
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 versus 5.005
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.56 versus 3.764
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 versus 1080
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 versus 1713
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 versus 1624
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 11 October 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s versus 11.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 versus 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 versus 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 versus 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 versus 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 versus 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 versus 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 versus 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 versus 1624 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1400 MHz versus 950 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- 34.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 versus 31.3
- 39.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 versus 43.4
- 17.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1624 versus 91.5
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1400 MHz versus 950 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 versus 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 versus 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 versus 91.5 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 | 3.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 | 87.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 | 0.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 | 5.005 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 | 3.764 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 | 1624 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31.3 | 1080 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 43.4 | 1713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 91.5 | 1624 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 602 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2262 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 11 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1497 | 1494 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $35.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Noyaux CUDA par GPU | 96 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
