NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M versus Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 720 MHz versus 650 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 80.6 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s
- 84x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 16
- 60.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,038 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
- 9.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3278 versus 347
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 351 versus 194
- 17.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9444 versus 538
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 versus 8.712
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 879.575 versus 155.638
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.823 versus 0.931
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.155 versus 7.36
- 8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.75 versus 12.009
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1263 versus 754
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2409 versus 1492
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3111 versus 2392
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1263 versus 754
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2409 versus 1492
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3111 versus 2392
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec versus 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 versus 16 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops versus 33.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3278 versus 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 versus 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9444 versus 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 versus 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 versus 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 versus 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 versus 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 versus 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 versus 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 versus 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 versus 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000
- Environ 39% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 758 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 100 Watt
Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3278 | 347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | 194 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9444 | 538 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | 0.931 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2409 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2409 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 | 2392 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Date de sortie | 4 June 2012 | 14 May 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1018 | 1501 |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz | 650 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 16 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 80.6 billion / sec | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Quick Sync |