NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 108 Watt versus 122 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4334 versus 3593
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 500 versus 440
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 versus 12225
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 versus 25.421
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.73 versus 2.31
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.194 versus 56.706
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 5683
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 5683
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 23 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4334 versus 3593 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 500 versus 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 versus 12225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 versus 25.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 versus 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 versus 2.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 versus 56.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 versus 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 versus 5683 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 92.2 billion / sec versus 87.81 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1344
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.434 versus 31.588
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 3311
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 versus 3382
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 3311
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.2 billion / sec versus 87.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1344 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 versus 31.588 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 3311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 versus 3382 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 3311 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4334 | 3593 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 500 | 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12321 | 12225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.016 | 25.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.063 | 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.73 | 2.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.588 | 35.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.194 | 56.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6373 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3382 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3311 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6373 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3382 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3311 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $854.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 699 | 701 |
Prix maintenant | $446.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 784 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 720 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,107 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 87.81 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3540 Million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 172.8 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |