NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti versus AMD FirePro W8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti and AMD FirePro W8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 210 billion / sec versus 100.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de pipelines plus haut: 2880 versus 1792
- Environ 66% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,345 gflops versus 3,226 gflops
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 versus 4096
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 versus 464
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.429 versus 64.628
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 versus 7400
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 versus 7400
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2013 versus 14 June 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 210 billion / sec versus 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1792 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops versus 3,226 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 versus 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 versus 464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 versus 64.628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 versus 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 versus 7400 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W8000
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 875 MHz
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 785.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 82941 versus 28211
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 387.109 versus 182.11
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 875 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5500 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 82941 versus 28211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 387.109 versus 182.11 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9517 | 4096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 635 | 464 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28211 | 82941 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.429 | 64.628 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2001.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.854 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 182.11 | 387.109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10021 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10021 | 7400 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3338 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti | AMD FirePro W8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK110B | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 7 November 2013 | 14 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $1,599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 397 | 409 |
| Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 928 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 875 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2880 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,345 gflops | 3,226 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2880 | 1792 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 210 billion / sec | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 279 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336 GB / s | 176 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 5500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
AMDFirePro S7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
