NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 797 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 95% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1440
- Environ 17% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 24% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 151 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3804 versus 1970
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 versus 400
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 16.467
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 1.541
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 versus 3806
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 versus 3806
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 30 September 2009 |
Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 725 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz versus 725 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1440 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 151 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 versus 1970 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 versus 400 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 16.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 1.541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 versus 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 versus 3806 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 60% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 versus 12815
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 705.616
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 13.832
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3679
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3679
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 versus 12815 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 13.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3804 | 1970 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 400 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12815 | 33977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 16.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 1109.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 1.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 42.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Cypress |
Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 30 September 2009 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 765 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | 725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 725 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1440 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 151 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity |