NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 10.8 billion / sec
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 96
- 4.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 258.05 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 5.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 478
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 91
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 2171
- 7.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 4.85
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 195.796
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 0.561
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 9.109
- 9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 16.727
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 960
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2701
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 960
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 2210
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 10.8 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 258.05 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 91 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 2171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 195.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 9.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 16.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2701 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- Environ 29% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 45 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 91 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 2171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 195.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 9.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 16.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 5 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 896 | 1503 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 10.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
