NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 21% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 952.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2516 versus 2074
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9705 versus 6389
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 24.415
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 1.83
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 29.702
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 67.215
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 2664
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3626
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3318
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 2664
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3626
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3318
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 28 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 952.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2516 versus 2074 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9705 versus 6389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 24.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 29.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 67.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3318 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
- Environ 10% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 39.7 billion / sec versus 36.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 349 versus 225
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 690.98 versus 388.248
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 39.7 billion / sec versus 36.08 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 349 versus 225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 690.98 versus 388.248 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2516 | 2074 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9705 | 6389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 24.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 690.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 1.83 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 29.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 67.215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3318 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 2664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3318 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 929 | 931 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 39.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,950 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 620 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 96.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |