NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 versus AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1188 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 95% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 49.2 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 720
- Environ 81% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,825 gflops versus 1,008.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 5.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 versus 1045
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 versus 280
- 7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 versus 8.039
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 758.865 versus 544.041
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 versus 0.867
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.738 versus 20.664
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 versus 91.074
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 versus 2100
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 3378
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 versus 2100
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 3378
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 versus 21 January 2011 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.2 billion / sec versus 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 720 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops versus 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 versus 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 versus 280 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 versus 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 versus 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 versus 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 versus 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 versus 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 versus 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 3378 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 86 Watt versus 90 Watt
- 175x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt versus 90 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 6.6 GB/s |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 280 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GM206 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 20 August 2015 | 21 January 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | $49.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 547 | 1020 |
Prix maintenant | $194.44 | $49.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.06 | 33.46 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1188 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1024 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 720 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 49.2 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 86 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | 170 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 105.6 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6.6 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |