NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 and AMD Radeon HD 6750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1188 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 49.2 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 768 vs 720
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5340 vs 1045
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 280
- 7.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 8.039
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 758.865 vs 544.041
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 vs 0.867
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.738 vs 20.664
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 231.508 vs 91.074
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 2100
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3378
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 2100
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3378
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 vs 21 January 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 720 |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops vs 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 vs 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 280 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 vs 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 vs 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 vs 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 vs 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 vs 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 vs 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 vs 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3378 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6750
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 86 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 175x more memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 86 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5340 | 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 280 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16728 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | 8.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | 544.041 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | 0.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | 20.664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | 91.074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | 2100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 3378 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 105 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | AMD Radeon HD 6750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM206 | Juniper |
Launch date | 20 August 2015 | 21 January 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $49.99 |
Place in performance rating | 547 | 1020 |
Price now | $194.44 | $49.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | 33.46 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | 1,008.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 720 |
Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 86 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | 170 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.6 GB/s | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |