NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 914 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1124 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 1,326 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 versus 2014
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 versus 7252
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 versus 8.832
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 versus 0.935
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 versus 19.952
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 versus 43.535
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 versus 3188
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3333
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 versus 3188
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3333
- 4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 versus 759
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 914 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 1,326 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 or 2500 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 versus 2014 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9744 versus 7252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 versus 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 versus 0.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 versus 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 versus 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 versus 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 versus 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 versus 759 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Environ 23% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55.23 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 versus 217
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 373.644
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s versus 44.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 versus 217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 373.644 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2577 | 2014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9744 | 7252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | 0.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 797 | 1005 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 914 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 2,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32 or 80 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M vs
AMDRadeon RX 640
