NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 versus AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and AMD Radeon R9 290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 947 MHz
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 versus 24 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 947 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 176.0 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1024
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,632 gflops versus 2,413 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 178.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1250 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8623 versus 6080
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 673
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 43456 versus 18677
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 114.883 versus 73.733
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 versus 792.44
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.12 versus 4.888
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 versus 35.338
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 628.757 versus 200.825
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8729 versus 7218
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 3335
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8729 versus 7218
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 versus 3691
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 3335
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3927 versus 2284
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 176.0 GTexel / s versus 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2816 versus 1024 |
Performance á point flottant | 5,632 gflops versus 2,413 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8623 versus 6080 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43456 versus 18677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.883 versus 73.733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 versus 792.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.12 versus 4.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 versus 35.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 628.757 versus 200.825 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8729 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8729 versus 7218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 versus 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3927 versus 2284 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6080 | 8623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18677 | 43456 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2284 | 3927 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM206 | Hawaii |
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 | 24 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | $549 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 503 | 301 |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 947 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops | 5,632 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2816 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec | 176.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 320 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |