NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1127 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 72 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s
- 51.2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 20
- 48.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,413 gflops versus 50 gflops
- 9.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 6111 versus 630
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 versus 314
- 5.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 18734 versus 3210
- 8.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.733 versus 8.844
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 792.44 versus 171.17
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.888 versus 1.115
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.338 versus 10.385
- 16.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 200.825 versus 12.361
- 7.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7218 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 2808
- 7.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7218 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3335 versus 2808
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 versus 3 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec versus 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 20 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops versus 50 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 versus 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 versus 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 versus 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 versus 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 versus 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 versus 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 versus 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 versus 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 versus 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 versus 2808 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1250 MHz versus 1178 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 194 versus 162
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz versus 1178 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 versus 162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6111 | 630 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | 314 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18734 | 3210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | 8.844 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | 171.17 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | 1.115 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | 10.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | 12.361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | 2808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | 2808 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 162 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GM206 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 22 January 2015 | 3 June 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 514 | 1359 |
Prix maintenant | $229.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1127 MHz | 400 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,413 gflops | 50 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 20 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 billion / sec | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Options SLI | 2x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pins | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Quick Sync |