NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt
Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3792 versus 3450
Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 335 versus 276
Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14345 versus 12622
Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 versus 34.836
Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.903 versus 3.038
2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 versus 81.753
Environ 37% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1831 versus 1336

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	9 January 2015 versus 12 March 2014
Vitesse du noyau	944 MHz versus 941 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt versus 100 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	3792 versus 3450
PassMark - G2D Mark	335 versus 276
Geekbench - OpenCL	14345 versus 12622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.59 versus 34.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.903 versus 3.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.296 versus 81.753
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1831 versus 1336

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 967 MHz versus 950 MHz
Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.3 GTexel / s versus 73.6 GTexel / s
Environ 31% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 1024
Environ 10% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,599 gflops versus 2,355 gflops
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 versus 720.592
Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 versus 57.947
Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6350 versus 5783
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 2566
Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6350 versus 5783
Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 2566

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	967 MHz versus 950 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	108.3 GTexel / s versus 73.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 versus 1024
Performance á point flottant	2,599 gflops versus 2,355 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	3 GB versus 2 GB
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	960.114 versus 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	59.57 versus 57.947
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6350 versus 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 versus 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 versus 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6350 versus 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 versus 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 versus 3337

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3792

3450

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

335

276

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

14345

12622

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.59

34.836

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

720.592

960.114

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.903

3.038

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

57.947

59.57

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

223.296

81.753

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5783

6350

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2566

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5783

6350

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2566

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3337

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1831

1336

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
PassMark - G3D Mark	3792	3450
PassMark - G2D Mark	335	276
Geekbench - OpenCL	14345	12622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.59	34.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	720.592	960.114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.903	3.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	57.947	59.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.296	81.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5783	6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2566	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3337	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5783	6350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2566	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3337	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1831	1336

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Nom de code	GM204	GK104
Date de sortie	9 January 2015	12 March 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	731	733
Genre	Laptop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	950 MHz	967 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	944 MHz	941 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	1024	1344
Performance á point flottant	2,355 gflops	2,599 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	1344
Taux de remplissage de la texture	73.6 GTexel / s	108.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	100 Watt
Compte de transistor	5,200 million	3,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++)	1	Up to 3840x2160
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDMI
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA	1	Up to 2048x1536
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2		Up to 3840x2160
Protection du contenu HDCP
Support du signale LVDS		Up to 1920x1200
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Taille du laptop	large	large
Options SLI	1
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	3 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	80 GB / s	120.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	192 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	2500 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Configuration standard de la mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
3D Blu-Ray
Direct Compute
FXAA
TXAA