NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 versus AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and AMD Radeon R9 280X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1178 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 69% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 148 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9635 versus 6150
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 versus 676
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 versus 89.187
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.76 versus 7.656
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 versus 9603
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 versus 9603
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 versus 8 October 2013 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9635 versus 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 versus 676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 versus 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 versus 7.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 versus 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 versus 9603 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Environ 17% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.0 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec
- Environ 23% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1664
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,096 gflops versus 3,920 gflops
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 versus 1225.96
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 versus 35.714
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 versus 489.884
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3340
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3340
- 6.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2351 versus 362
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s versus 109 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1664 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops versus 3,920 gflops |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 versus 1225.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 versus 35.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 versus 489.884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 versus 362 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9635 | 6150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.76 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 489.884 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 362 | 2351 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
Date de sortie | 19 September 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 378 | 380 |
Prix maintenant | $407.76 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1178 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1050 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1664 | |
Performance á point flottant | 3,920 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 109 billion / sec | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 275 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Options SLI | 4x | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pins | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |