NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 81 Watt versus 195 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2048 MB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5709 versus 5568
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19031 versus 18403
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 59.428 versus 46.086
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1113.788 versus 989.685
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.101 versus 36.463
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 versus 3306
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 versus 7222
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 versus 3666
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 versus 3306
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2286 versus 2004
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt versus 195 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2048 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 versus 5568 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 versus 18403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 versus 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 versus 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 versus 36.463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 versus 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 versus 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 versus 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 versus 2004 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1006 MHz versus 924 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1058 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.8 billion / sec versus 83.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1280
- Environ 16% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,657 gflops
- 2.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 versus 385
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 versus 4.157
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 99.577 versus 81.909
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1006 MHz versus 924 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1058 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.8 billion / sec versus 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,090.4 gflops versus 2,657 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 versus 385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 versus 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.577 versus 81.909 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5709 | 5568 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 385 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19031 | 18403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2286 | 2004 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM204 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 558 | 560 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,899 | $579.99 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.99 | 12.83 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1058 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | 3-way |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2048 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAP104-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
