NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 14x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 1001.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 30.505
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 versus 35.416
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 versus 62.69
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3690
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3690
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 versus 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 937 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 2392
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 240
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 9329
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 535.24
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 2.64
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 versus 888
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 937 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 2392 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 240 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 9329 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 535.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 2.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 versus 888 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108B | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 861 | 740 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX250 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
