NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 954 MHz
- 5x plus de pipelines: 1920 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 8.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 1578
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 versus 385
- 17.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 4071
- 15.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 14.332
- 11.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 265.424
- 19.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 1.093
- 8.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 15.009
- 29.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 38.219
- 8.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 2446
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 1631
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 1974
- 8.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 2446
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 1631
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 1974
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 1 March 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 versus 384 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 1578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 versus 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 4071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 14.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 265.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 1.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 15.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 38.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 1974 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 160 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 | 1578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 | 385 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 | 4071 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 14.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 265.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 1.093 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 15.009 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 38.219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 2446 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 1631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 1974 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1242 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 1 March 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 161 | 1206 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | $164.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | 11.74 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 1,270 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 202 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
