NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1470 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 18% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2176
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18252 versus 16576
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 versus 859
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 87091
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 246.191
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3885.018
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 27.053
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1271.757
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 20969
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 20969
- 3.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1470 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2176 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 versus 16576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 versus 859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 87091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 27.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1271.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 20969 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 165.463 versus 158.103
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3718
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3359
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3718
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 versus 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 16576 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 87091 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 246.191 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3885.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 27.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 165.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1271.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 5567 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 5026 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 2 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 145 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1470 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | 2176 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | 89 C |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2176 |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10.8 B |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | 4 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | 4.435” (112.6mm) |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 9.0” (228.60mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 8 pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | 2-Slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |