NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti versus AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon R9 270X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 7 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 82.80 GTexel/s versus 84 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 1280
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 versus 4869
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 229.393 versus 63.87
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2082.931 versus 1314.72
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.561 versus 6.354
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 85.21
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 599.217 versus 315.412
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 versus 8068
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 versus 8068
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s versus 84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 1280 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 versus 4869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 versus 63.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 versus 1314.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 versus 6.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 85.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 versus 315.412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 versus 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 versus 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1050 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 613 versus 497
- 3.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1772 versus 469
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1050 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 versus 497 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1772 versus 469 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 4869 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 613 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | 63.87 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | 1314.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | 6.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 85.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | 315.412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 | 1772 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Curacao |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2021 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 440 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $399 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1035 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.80 GTexel/s | 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 2,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,688 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2 x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
