NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 970 versus 776
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11911 versus 11659
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 60604 versus 58014
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1329 versus 1065
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 210.151 versus 189.842
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2513.128 versus 1902.867
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.875 versus 13.408
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 versus 14 March 2019 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 versus 776 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 versus 11659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 versus 58014 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 versus 1065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 versus 189.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 versus 1902.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 versus 13.408 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1755 MHz
- Environ 8% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 130 Watt
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 versus 81.395
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 806.848
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1755 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 81.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 806.848 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 970 | 776 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11911 | 11659 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60604 | 58014 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1329 | 1065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 210.151 | 189.842 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.128 | 1902.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.875 | 13.408 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.395 | 116.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 806.848 | 875.838 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA106 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 4 Jan 2022 | 14 March 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 205 | 258 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1755 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 126.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.087 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 126.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 224.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 8004 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
