NVIDIA Quadro K4200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K4200 and NVIDIA Quadro K2100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4200

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 667 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 87.81 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
2.3x plus de pipelines: 1344 versus 576
2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,107 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 3008 MHz
3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4340 versus 1363
Environ 74% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 498 versus 287
2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12321 versus 4566
2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.016 versus 12.383
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.063 versus 358.892
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.73 versus 1.107
Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.588 versus 21.761
Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.194 versus 40.703
2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6373 versus 2294
2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6373 versus 2294

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	22 July 2014 versus 23 July 2013
Vitesse du noyau	771 MHz versus 667 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	87.81 GTexel / s versus 32.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1344 versus 576
Performance á point flottant	2,107 gflops versus 768.4 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	4 GB versus 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5400 MHz versus 3008 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	4340 versus 1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	498 versus 287
Geekbench - OpenCL	12321 versus 4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.016 versus 12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063 versus 358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.73 versus 1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588 versus 21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.194 versus 40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373 versus 2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373 versus 2294

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 55 Watt versus 108 Watt
Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3605 versus 3382
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 3311
Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3605 versus 3382
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 3311

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt versus 108 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3605 versus 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3362 versus 3311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3605 versus 3382
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3362 versus 3311

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4340

1363

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

287

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

12321

4566

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

33.016

12.383

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

736.063

358.892

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.73

1.107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

31.588

21.761

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

70.194

40.703

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6373

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3362

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6373

2294

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3382

3605

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3311

3362

Nom	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	4340	1363
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	287
Geekbench - OpenCL	12321	4566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	33.016	12.383
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	736.063	358.892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.73	1.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.588	21.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.194	40.703
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6373	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3382	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3311	3362
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6373	2294
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3382	3605
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3311	3362
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA Quadro K4200	NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK104	GK106
Date de sortie	22 July 2014	23 July 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$854.99	$84.95
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	681	1101
Prix maintenant	$446.99	$159.99
Genre	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	11.92	10.91
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	784 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	771 MHz	667 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2,107 gflops	768.4 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1344	576
Taux de remplissage de la texture	87.81 GTexel / s	32.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	108 Watt	55 Watt
Compte de transistor	3,540 million	2,540 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Longeur	241 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 6-pin
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	172.8 GB / s	48.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	256 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5400 MHz	3008 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus