NVIDIA Quadro K5100M versus ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and ATI Radeon HD 5850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 89% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 98.69 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1440
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,369 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 51% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 151 Watt
- 8x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3118 versus 1972
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 versus 3806
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 versus 3806
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 30 September 2009 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s versus 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 1440 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops versus 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 151 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3118 versus 1972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 versus 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 versus 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 versus 365
- 2.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 versus 12294
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.467 versus 5.972
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 versus 355.305
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.541 versus 1.022
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 versus 15.706
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 versus 365 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 versus 12294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.467 versus 5.972 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 versus 355.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.541 versus 1.022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 versus 15.706 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3118 | 1972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 401 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12294 | 33977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | 3806 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Cypress |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 30 September 2009 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 764 | 766 |
| Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
| Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1440 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 725 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K5100M avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
