NVIDIA Quadro K620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 61% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 268.8 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2220 versus 668
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 versus 238
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6869 versus 2262
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.112 versus 5.698
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 297.631 versus 175.385
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.427 versus 0.497
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.363 versus 9.27
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 versus 1064
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2490 versus 1589
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3329 versus 2716
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 versus 1064
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2490 versus 1589
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3329 versus 2716
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 14 May 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 versus 668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 versus 238 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 versus 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 versus 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 versus 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 versus 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 versus 9.27 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 versus 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 versus 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 versus 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 versus 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 versus 2716 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2220 | 668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | 238 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6869 | 2262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.112 | 5.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 297.631 | 175.385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.427 | 0.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.363 | 9.27 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.125 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2970 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2490 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 2716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2970 | 1064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2490 | 1589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 2716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 702 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Nom de code | GM107 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 14 May 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 953 | 1361 |
Prix maintenant | $189.93 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.23 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz | 700 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s | 11.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 160 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | DDR3 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |