NVIDIA Quadro P400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 versus 156
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 versus 18 August 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 versus 156 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1228 MHz
- Environ 36% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1708 MHz versus 1252 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 123.0 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s
- 4.5x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 256
- 5.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 679.9 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- 5.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 versus 1651
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 versus 435
- 10.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 versus 3053
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 versus 19.856
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 versus 309.824
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 versus 1.38
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 versus 25.011
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 versus 84.489
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 versus 2709
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 versus 2875
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 versus 2709
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 versus 2875
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1228 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1708 MHz versus 1252 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 123.0 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 679.9 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 versus 1651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 versus 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32384 versus 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 versus 19.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 versus 309.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 versus 1.38 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 versus 25.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 versus 84.489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 versus 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 versus 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 versus 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 versus 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 versus 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 versus 3328 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | 9796 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | 772 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 32384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.856 | 115.073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 309.824 | 1325.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.38 | 8.057 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.011 | 31.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.489 | 425.709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3338 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 | 156 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 7 February 2017 | 18 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | $199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 983 | 388 |
| Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1252 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.25 GTexel / s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 250 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P400 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX230
