NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 120 Watt
• 4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 617 vs 156

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1228 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• 5.8x more texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 4.5x more pipelines: 1152 vs 256
• 5.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 1651
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 435
• 10.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 vs 3053
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 19.856
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1325.07 vs 309.824
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 1.38
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.946 vs 25.011
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 84.489
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 2709
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 2875
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 2709
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 2875

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 9796
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 772
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 32384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 115.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 1325.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 8.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 31.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 425.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 156

Compare specifications (specs)