NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1215 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 175.0 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 275 Watt
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 versus 114.288
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 versus 10.947
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 18 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s versus 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 versus 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 versus 10.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Environ 22% de pipelines plus haut: 2816 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9443 versus 8366
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 343
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 versus 2046.214
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 versus 94.532
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 683.568 versus 645.647
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 versus 10140
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 versus 10140
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9443 versus 8366 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 versus 2046.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 versus 94.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 versus 645.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 versus 10140 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 versus 10140 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 9443 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 114.288 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 2911.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 10.947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 118.411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 683.568 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 11675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | Grenada |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 325 | 279 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $429 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 6,200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 44 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 275 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 512 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
