NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1110 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 550
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 12640
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 19529
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 19529
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 550 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 12640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 19529 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 0 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 550 | 869 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 | 19370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 171 | 103 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | IGP | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |