NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 91.20 GTexel/s versus 94.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 1024 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7845 versus 6931
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 42926 versus 22499
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 versus 113.416
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 versus 1414.794
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 versus 6.736
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 versus 81.206
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 versus 417.823
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s versus 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7845 versus 6931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42926 versus 22499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 versus 113.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 versus 1414.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 versus 6.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 versus 81.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 versus 417.823 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1076 MHz versus 855 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 5 GB versus 4 GB
- 5.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 643 versus 461
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 versus 2476
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 versus 2238
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 versus 9851
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 versus 2476
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1076 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 643 versus 461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7845 | 6931 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | 643 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42926 | 22499 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 113.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 1414.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 6.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 81.206 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 417.823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 10251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3316 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GP106 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 353 | 394 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $585 | |
| Prix maintenant | $429.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 1076 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 45.60 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 94.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,031 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 201 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 5 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 140.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M
