NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 215 Watt
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- 2.9x plus de pipelines: 2944 versus 1024
- Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 versus 7160
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 452
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 38863
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 9313
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3698
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3353
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 9313
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3698
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3353
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10965 versus 3319
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 1024 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 versus 7160 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 452 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10965 versus 3319 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7160 | 18811 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 102535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 10965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU117 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 368 | 97 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |