NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile versus AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

versus

AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 735 MHz versus 723 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 145.2 GTexel/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2048
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9962 versus 3597
Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 versus 435
2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 56966 versus 22044
3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 versus 64.199
Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 versus 1284.053
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 versus 5.881
Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 versus 78.169
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 versus 312.822
Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 versus 6508
Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 versus 6508

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	735 MHz versus 723 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	145.2 GTexel/s versus 92.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2560 versus 2048
Processus de fabrication	8 nm versus 28 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	9962 versus 3597
PassMark - G2D Mark	476 versus 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	56966 versus 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.984 versus 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2138.158 versus 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.498 versus 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	151.433 versus 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	729.947 versus 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12750 versus 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12750 versus 6508

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 95 Watt
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 versus 3708
7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 versus 3355
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 versus 3708
7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 versus 3355

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt versus 95 Watt
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8593 versus 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	24690 versus 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8593 versus 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	24690 versus 3355

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9962

3597

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

476

435

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

56966

22044

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

202.984

64.199

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2138.158

1284.053

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16.498

5.881

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

151.433

78.169

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

729.947

312.822

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

6508

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

8593

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

24690

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12750

6508

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3708

8593

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

24690

Nom	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark	9962	3597
PassMark - G2D Mark	476	435
Geekbench - OpenCL	56966	22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	202.984	64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2138.158	1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	16.498	5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	151.433	78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	729.947	312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12750	6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3708	8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12750	6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3708	8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	24690

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Essentiel
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 3.0
Nom de code	GA106	Amethyst
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	267	303
Conception		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Date de sortie		5 May 2015
Genre		Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1815 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	735 MHz	723 MHz
Processus de fabrication	8 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	145.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.293 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2048
Pixel fill rate	87.12 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture	145.2 GTexel/s	92.54 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	13250 million	5,000 million
Performance á point flottant		2,961 gflops
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Taille du laptop		large
Soutien API
DirectX	12.2	12
OpenCL	3.0	Not Listed
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Mantle
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	192 GB/s	160.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 bit	256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Genre de mémoire	GDDR6	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
DualGraphics
FreeSync
HD3D
PowerTune
Graphiques changeables
ZeroCore