NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 723 MHz
• 1569.1x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9962 vs 3597
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 435
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56966 vs 22044
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 64.199
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1284.053
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 5.881
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 78.169
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 312.822
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 6508
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 6508

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X

• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3708
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3355
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3708
• 7.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3355

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9962 3597
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 435
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	56966 22044
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	202.984 64.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138.158 1284.053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.498 5.881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	151.433 78.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	729.947 312.822
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 24690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12750 6508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 8593
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3355 24690

Compare specifications (specs)